This is how I simulated sun today!
The audio codec used is Cirrus Logic / WM1840, which is not a part listed on their public website
http://www.cirrus.com/en/products/codecs.html and also rather elusive on the web.
As there's outputs named HPOUT1L to HPOUT3R, I would guess that it's equipped with 6 DAC channels to line/or amplified headphones out, and from with the same approach 4 DAC channels to speaker out.
I count as well 4 audio input interface (from the CPU to the codec), 2 stereo ASRC, 2 stereo DRC, and DSP count goes from 1 to 7.
Well you got the point, lots of channels and mixing capabilities 🙂
Galaxy S6 audioflinger native sampling frequency is 48kHz.
I didn't evaluate the quality of the resampler yet.
The back camera sensor is confirmed to be a Sony IMX240, the same as rumored and already present in the Note 4.
It means the additional features compared to its bigger brother come from ISP capabilities, not the sensor itself.
Codecs – Smart Codecs with Integrated Programmable DSP, Portable Codecs, Mono/Stereo Codecs, Multichannel Codecs, AC ’97 and HD Audio Codecs, Noise Cancellation Codecs
Part, DACs / ADCs, Dynamic Range (dB), THD+N (dB), Sample Rate (kHz), Analog I/O, Power Supply (V), DSP and Other Features, Package. WM8281Buy Now Sample, 8 / 6, 121 DAC; 100 ADC, -92 DAC; -89 ADC, 192, Single-ended. Differential, VA = 1.7 to 5.5; VD = 1.14 to 1.9, Multi-Core, 600 MIPS …
– Adaptive display
– AMOLED cinema
– AMOLED photo
To anticipate some marketing or analysts claims, here are graphs and data representing the display of one unit, at 100% brightness.
Note: Those are based on preliminary results from a colorimeter only and I will apply some corrections based on the readings of a spectrophotometer.
If you look only at the 2D CIE 1932 gamut and saturations graph, the gamut and saturations seems to match rather closely to the sRGB or Rec.709 standards. It will affect the CIE diagram slightly but not the curves.
However it would be a mistake to claim that this display is color accurate to any existing standard, the reason being that the grayscale luminance and gamma response are wrong.
In fact, the average gamma ends up at 2.49 here which is really high: it makes things darker and more contrasty than they should (an approximate average gamma is 2.2)
So while the screen might look satisfyingly accurate if you look only at one particular graph, the Galaxy S6 display in Basic mode can't be trusted for color-critical work like video or photo editing.
Also, because of the correction required to reduce the saturation that's mechanically increased by a higher gamma, the overall appearance in Basic mode is inconsistent, and looking "off" to a trained eye.
There's more to say about the other modes but that'll be for later 🙂
The real #MWC15 starts in less than 8 hours!
Don't hesitate to point authors of a claim like "very accurate display", "most accurate ever" to the graphs attached.
They're making a mistake in their analysis: you can't look at only a fraction of the data, represented in a specific way and claim that it validates all the rest. But apparently it's a very common mistake.